You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Information and Disinformation Boundaries and Interfaces

Fulltext:


Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

Proceedings-IS4SI 2021

Publisher:

MDPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081049


Abstract

This paper presents the highlights from the Boundaries of Disinformation workshop held at Chalmers University of Technology. It addresses the phenomenon of disinformation—its historical and current forms. Digitalization and hyperconnectivity have been identified as leading contemporary sources of disinformation. In the effort to counteract disinformation globally, diverse strategies have been proposed. However, it is important not to forget the need for the balance between individual freedom of expression and institutionalized societal thinking used to prevent spreading disinformation. The important aspect of the solution is that the debate about adequate and truthful information, as opposed to disinformation, involves stakeholders.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Dodig-Crnkovic6594,
author = {Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic},
title = {Information and Disinformation Boundaries and Interfaces},
isbn = {2504-3900},
editor = {Marcin Schroeder and Mark Burgin},
volume = {81},
number = {1},
pages = {49--52},
month = {March},
year = {2022},
booktitle = {Proceedings-IS4SI 2021},
publisher = {MDPI},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/6594-}
}