You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.
The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.
For the reports in this repository we specifically note that
- the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
- the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
- technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
- in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information
By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.
If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se
AI Generates, Model-Based Testing Checks: A Model-Based Approach to Validating AI-Generated Test Cases
Publication Type:
Conference/Workshop Paper
Venue:
Digital Twin Experiences and Model-Based Testing Methods @ AEiC 2026
Abstract
AI agents can increasingly generate executable tests from code, requirements, and human-written natural-language prompts, but the resulting tests often remain difficult to trust. They may compile and run, yet remain arbitrary or inconsistent with the intended system behavior. This paper proposes using Model-Based Testing (MBT) to check and classify AI-generated tests. We treat these generated software artifacts as candidate tests that must be checked against an MBT model. We define checks for the model path, guards, inputs, adequacy, and MBT logs. One can then classify candidate tests as model-backed, model-extending, or model-inconsistent. The contribution is a conceptual framework for making AI-assisted test generation more reviewable and reusable in quality assurance.
Bibtex
@inproceedings{Enoiu7400,
author = {Eduard Paul Enoiu},
title = {AI Generates, Model-Based Testing Checks: A Model-Based Approach to Validating AI-Generated Test Cases},
month = {June},
year = {2026},
booktitle = {Digital Twin Experiences and Model-Based Testing Methods @ AEiC 2026},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/7400-}
}