You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.
The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.
For the reports in this repository we specifically note that
- the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
- the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
- technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
- in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information
By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.
If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se
Extraction of working memory load and the importance of understanding the temporal dynamics
Publication Type:
Conference/Workshop Paper
Venue:
2017 8th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering
Abstract
Working memory processing is central for higher-order cognitive functions. Although the ability to access and extract working memory load has been proven feasible, the temporal resolution is low and cross-task generalization is poor. In this study, EEG oscillatory activity was recorded from sixteen healthy subjects while they performed two versions of the visual n-back task. Observed effects in the working memory-related EEG oscillatory activity, specifically in theta, alpha and low beta power, are significantly different in the two tasks (i.e. two categories of visual stimuli) and these differences are greatest after image onset. Furthermore, cross-task generalization can be obtained by concatenating both tasks and although similar performances are observed before and after image onset, this study highlights the complexity of working memory processing related to different categories of visual stimuli, particularly after image onset, that are crucial to understand, in order to interpret the extraction of working memory load.
Bibtex
@inproceedings{Astrand5233,
author = {Elaine {\AA}strand and Martin Ekstr{\"o}m},
title = {Extraction of working memory load and the importance of understanding the temporal dynamics},
volume = {2017},
number = {641-647},
booktitle = {2017 8th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/5233-}
}