You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Analysing Response-Times for Tasks with Offsets, Tight Resluts at Fast Speed

Fulltext:


Publication Type:

Report - MRTC

ISRN:

MDH-MRTC-161/2004-1-SE


Abstract

We present an novel method to calculate approximate upper bounds on the worst-case response-times for tasks which may have offset relations amongst them. The response-times calculated are tighter (i.e lower) than previous methods and the calculation time is significantly shorter. We have previously obtained both of these benefits in isolation, and in this paper the two methods are combined to form a tight and fast response-time analysis for tasks with offsets. In a comprehensive simulation study we explore both the tightness and analysis speed of; exact analysis for tasks with offsets, traditional approximate analysis, our previous fast analysis, our previous tight analysis, and the novel combined tight and fast analysis. The results show that adding tightness to our fast analysis has a insignificant (albeit negative) impact on the analysis time. Since the tight and fast analysis always calculates the same response-times as those of the tight analysis, our tight and fast method is the preferred method to use in any situation high-quality response-time estimates are needed within reasonable analysis time.

Bibtex

@techreport{Maki-Turja599,
author = {Jukka M{\"a}ki-Turja and Mikael Sj{\"o}din},
title = {Analysing Response-Times for Tasks with Offsets, Tight Resluts at Fast Speed},
number = {ISSN 1404-3041 ISRN MDH-MRTC-161/2004-1-SE},
month = {May},
year = {2004},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/599-}
}