You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Argument Patterns for Multi-Concern Assurance of Connected Automated Driving Systems

Fulltext:


Authors:

Fredrik Warg , Martin Skoglund

Note:

Already present in diva.

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

4th International Workshop on Security and Dependability of Critical Embedded Real-Time Systems

DOI:

10.4230/OASIcs.CERTS.2019.3

Abstract

Showing that dependable embedded systems fulfil vital quality attributes, e.g. by conforming to relevant standards, can be challenging. For emerging and increasingly complex functions, such as connected automated driving (CAD), there is also a need to ensure that attributes such as safety, cybersecurity, and availability are fulfilled simultaneously. Furthermore, such systems are often designed using existing parts, including 3rd party components, which must be included in the quality assurance. This paper discusses how to structure the argument at the core of an assurance case taking these considerations into account, and proposes patterns to aid in this task. The patterns are applied in a case study with an example automotive function. While the aim has primarily been safety and security assurance of CAD, their generic nature make the patterns relevant for multi-concern assurance in general.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Warg5962,
author = {Fredrik Warg and Martin Skoglund},
title = {Argument Patterns for Multi-Concern Assurance of Connected Automated Driving Systems},
isbn = {978-3-95977-119-1},
note = {Already present in diva.},
month = {August},
year = {2019},
booktitle = {4th International Workshop on Security and Dependability of Critical Embedded Real-Time Systems},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/5962-}
}