You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Post-Velocity Software Engineering: Assurance Saturation in AI-Enabled Socio-Technical Systems

Fulltext:


Authors:

Alessio Bucaioni

Research group:

Industrial Software Engineering

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Abstract

Automation and large language models are increasing the rate at which software changes can be produced in AI-enabled socio-technical systems. Yet responsible digital transformation is not only about generating code, models, or system modifications; it also requires understanding, validating, contesting, and approving changes before they can be trusted in operational, organizational, or public-interest settings. These assurance and governance activities depend on human attention, organizational processes, accountable oversight, audit evidence, and the participation of institutions and affected stakeholders, and they do not scale at the same pace as automated generation. We argue that software engineering is approaching a regime in which the rate of change can exceed the capacity of teams, institutions, and affected communities to review, contest, and govern it responsibly. We call this regime emph{post-velocity software engineering}. Beyond this threshold, increasing development speed may no longer improve outcomes and may instead weaken justified confidence, reduce oversight quality, and shift risk downstream into operations, users, communities, and public institutions. This article introduces post-velocity software engineering as a governance saturation problem in AI-enabled socio-technical systems. It describes signals that organizations may be approaching this threshold and outlines a research agenda for understanding how AI-accelerated development reshapes the balance between software production, assurance, accountability, contestability, and community-in-the-loop governance.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Bucaioni7419,
author = {Alessio Bucaioni},
title = {Post-Velocity Software Engineering: Assurance Saturation in AI-Enabled Socio-Technical Systems},
month = {September},
year = {2026},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/7419-}
}