You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.
The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.
For the reports in this repository we specifically note that
- the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
- the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
- technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
- in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information
By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.
If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se
Avoiding the Intrinsic Unfairness of the Trolley Problem
Publication Type:
Conference/Workshop Paper
Venue:
FairWare '18 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness Pages 32-37
Abstract
As an envisaged future of transportation, self-driving cars are being
discussed from various perspectives, including social, economical,
engineering, computer science, design, and ethical aspects. On the
one hand, self-driving cars present new engineering problems that
are being gradually successfully solved. On the other hand, social
and ethical problems have up to now being presented in the form
of an idealized unsolvable decision-making problem, the so-called
“trolley problem”, which is built on the assumptions that are neither
technically nor ethically justifiable. The intrinsic unfairness of the
trolley problem comes from the assumption that lives of different
people have different values.
In this paper, techno-social arguments are used to show the infeasibility
of the trolley problem when addressing the ethics of selfdriving
cars. We argue that different components can contribute to
an “unfair” behaviour and features, which requires ethical analysis
on multiple levels and stages of the development process. Instead
of an idealized and intrinsically unfair thought experiment, we
present real-life techno-social challenges relevant for the domain
of software fairness in the context of self-driving cars
Bibtex
@inproceedings{Holstein5259,
author = {Tobias Holstein and Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic},
title = {Avoiding the Intrinsic Unfairness of the Trolley Problem},
isbn = {978-1-4503-5746-3},
month = {June},
year = {2018},
booktitle = {FairWare '18 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness Pages 32-37 },
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/5259-}
}