You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Identifying Incentives for More Systematic Modeling of Industrial Software-Intensive Systems

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

14th International Conference on Model-Based Software and Systems Engineering

Publisher:

SciTePress

DOI:

10.5220/0014292500004058


Abstract

Software-intensive systems are characterized by intricate interactions, distributed structures, and ongoing evolution posing notable challenges for traceability, change analysis, and decision support. Modeling and versioning practices are widely used to manage this complexity; however, in practice, they are often fragmented, limiting the value that organizations can derive from them. To address this challenge, we map modeling and versioning practices to the benefits they enable, providing a structured framework for practitioners to assess their current practices and identify opportunities for incremental improvement. Building on findings from our previous interview study with multiple companies, together with insights from the literature, we identify four levels of modeling formality, five levels of versioning sophistication, and four categories of benefits, summarized in two mapping tables. Our contributions include a practitioner-oriented roadmap that helps teams reflect on current modeling and versioning practices, anticipate achievable benefits, and identify incremental adjustments that can add value with minimal overhead. An initial validation with industry representatives confirms the practical relevance of the roadmap and highlights its potential to guide structured reflection and improvement of modeling and versioning practices.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Qaisar7364,
author = {Ifrah Qaisar and Jan Carlson and Robbert Jongeling and Antonio Cicchetti and Malvina Latifaj and Federico Ciccozzi},
title = {Identifying Incentives for More Systematic Modeling of Industrial Software-Intensive Systems},
isbn = {978-989-758-798-6},
pages = {234--244},
month = {March},
year = {2026},
booktitle = {14th International Conference on Model-Based Software and Systems Engineering},
publisher = {SciTePress},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/7364-}
}