You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Deriving Reusable Process-based Arguments from Process Models in the Context of Railway Safety Standards

Fulltext:


Publication Type:

Journal article

Venue:

Ada User Journal 36 (4)

DOI:

ISSN 1381-6551


Abstract

In the railway domain, standards such as the EN5012x family prescribe processes to be followed for the management and certification of safety-critical systems. This results in a need to model processes and retrieve process-based arguments to prove that the system achieved the required safety level in order to reduce time and cost spent in the certification process. In this paper, we present the application of the MDSafeCer, i.e. a model-driven safety certification method, for railways. In particular, we model in SPEM 2.0 the safety requirements process according to what described in the safety plan, and we show how it is possible to extract safety evidence to prove the compliance of this process to the EN50128 standard.

Bibtex

@article{Gallina4139,
author = {Barbara Gallina and Luciana Provenzano},
title = {Deriving Reusable Process-based Arguments from Process Models in the Context of Railway Safety Standards},
volume = {36},
number = {4},
pages = {237--241},
month = {December},
year = {2015},
journal = {Ada User Journal 36 (4) },
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/4139-}
}