You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.
The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.
For the reports in this repository we specifically note that
- the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
- the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
- technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
- in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information
By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.
If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se
Pupil Diameter Does Not Covary with Learning During Single-Session Neurofeedback Training
Publication Type:
Conference/Workshop Paper
Venue:
IEEE EMBS, the 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2024
Abstract
One of the major challenges in neurofeedback (NFB)
research is that a large proportion of users have difficulty or
cannot learn to control their neural activity when provided feedback.
Studying learning from a fundamental perspective, using
independent measures, during NFB training is crucial to address
this challenge. Our aim in this study was to investigate whether
the pupil diameter can be used as a biomarker for learning neural
self-regulation. Twenty healthy subjects performed four sessions
of NFB training to control different electroencephalogram (EEG)
power features. We did not observe any differences in pupil
diameter across NFB sessions between learners and non-learners.
In addition, no correlation was found between the pupil diameter
and the targeted EEG power features during NFB training for
all subjects. Our results indicate that the pupil diameter does
not covary with learning neural self-regulation, possibly due to
confounding factors such as mental fatigue. Further studies are
needed to explore whether other eye-related parameters can be
linked to learning during NFB training.
Bibtex
@inproceedings{Silva6993,
author = {Joana Silva and Elmeri Syrj{\"a}nen and Elaine {\AA}strand},
title = {Pupil Diameter Does Not Covary with Learning During Single-Session Neurofeedback Training},
month = {August},
year = {2024},
booktitle = {IEEE EMBS, the 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2024},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/6993-}
}