You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.
The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.
For the reports in this repository we specifically note that
- the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
- the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
- technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
- in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information
By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.
If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se
Learning single and compound-protocol automata and checking behavioral equivalences
Publication Type:
Journal article
Venue:
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
Abstract
This paper presents a method and a practical implementation that complements traditional conformance testing. We infer a Mealy state machine of the system-under-test using active automata learning. This automaton is checked for bisimulation with a specification automaton modeled after the standard, which provides a strong verdict of conformance or nonconformance. We further present a method to learn models of multiple communication protocols running on the same device using a dispatcher system in conjunction with the same automata learning algorithms. We subsequently use similar checking methods to compare it with separately learned models. This allows for determining whether there is some interference or interaction between those protocols. In the practical execution of the system, we concentrate on lower levels of the Near-Field Communication (NFC, ISO/IEC 14443-3) and the Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE) protocols. As a by-product, we share some observations of the performance of different learning algorithms and calibrations in the specific setting of ISO/IEC 14443-3, which is the difficulty to learn models of systems that a) consist of two very similar structures and b) timeout very frequently, as well as the role of conformance testing for compound models and speed optimizations for time-sensitive protocols.
Bibtex
@article{Marksteiner7180,
author = {Stefan Marksteiner and David Sch{\"o}gler and Marjan Sirjani and Mikael Sj{\"o}din},
title = {Learning single and compound-protocol automata and checking behavioral equivalences},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
month = {April},
year = {2025},
journal = { International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/7180-}
}