You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Separation of Concerns in Process Compliance Checking: Divide-and-Conquer

Fulltext:


Authors:

Julieth Patricia Castellanos Ardila, Barbara Gallina

Research group:

Certifiable Evidences & Justification Engineering

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

29th European & Asian System, Software & Service Process Improvement & Innovation

Publisher:

Springer International Publishing

DOI:

10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_10

Abstract

Compliance with multiple standard’s reference models has the potential to improve process quality but is a challenging task faced by manufacturers in the safety-critical context. To facilitate this task, we propose a method for automated process compliance checking that can be used as a basis for decision making. Our method requires users to create a knowledge base of formalized requirements and processes checkable for compliance. In this paper, we exploit the natural separation of concerns in the state of practice to offer adequate means to facilitate the creation of the required concepts by using a divide and conquer strategy. For this, we discuss the impact of process factors in compliance assessment and provide separation of concerns based on SPEM 2.0 (Systems and Software Process Engineering Metamodel). Then, we illustrate the defined concerns and discuss our findings.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Castellanos Ardila5821,
author = {Julieth Patricia Castellanos Ardila and Barbara Gallina},
title = {Separation of Concerns in Process Compliance Checking: Divide-and-Conquer},
month = {September},
year = {2020},
booktitle = {29th European {\&} Asian System, Software {\&} Service Process Improvement {\&} Innovation},
publisher = {Springer International Publishing },
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/5821-}
}