You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

How do practitioners reason about security requirements? An interview study

Authors:

Luciana Provenzano, Robbert Jongeling

Research group:

Industrial Software Engineering

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

Requirements Engineering 2024

Abstract

In the development of modern software-intensive systems, security aspects are increasingly emphasized, with new laws and regulations putting more demands on manufacturers. Requirements elicitation must therefore carefully consider security aspects. The literature contains various frameworks that have been proposed to aid in the elicitation of these types of requirements. We are interested to understand how, in industrial practice, persons responsible for cybersecurity reason about so-called ``security requirements''. To find out, we perform eight semi-structured interviews with experts having leading roles in cybersecurity in large companies. We identify the concepts that they leverage when reasoning about security requirements, what other aspects they look at when identifying security requirements, how they differ between security requirements and other requirements, and what their definition of a security requirement is. In this paper, we report on this interview study and our analysis of it. We highlight the commonalities and crucial differences between experts' reasoning, and a surprising spread of conclusions regarding the identification of example requirements as being security requirements or not. Our analysis opens a new perspective on how to deal with security requirements, we hypothesize the benefits of using multiple approaches for elicitation and a single approach for requirements specification.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Provenzano6942,
author = {Luciana Provenzano and Robbert Jongeling},
title = {How do practitioners reason about security requirements? An interview study},
month = {June},
year = {2024},
booktitle = {Requirements Engineering 2024},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/6942-}
}